Years ago, God gave modern prophets such as Henry Gruver and Dumitru Duduman visions of the nuclear destruction of America. At the time many people scoffed and laughed because they could not see how anyone would ever dare attack the United States considering the fact that we had thousands of nuclear missiles ready to obliterate anyone who messed with us. However, times have radically changed. Now Barack Obama is proposing to strip America's nuclear arsenal down to just a few hundred deployed nuclear warheads, and there has not been any uproar about it. Will Barack Obama's policy of extreme disarmament set the stage for the nuclear destruction of America in the last days as foreseen by Henry Gruver and Dumitru Duduman?
A number of months ago in Prague, Barack Obama openly called for a world free of nuclear weapons during one of his first major foreign policy speeches.
When many politicians speak of such "pie in the sky" proposals, people do not take them seriously.
But it turns out that Barack Obama was deadly serious.
In fact, Barack Obama is now demanding that the U.S. military conduct a "radical review" of the U.S. nuclear weapons program in preparation for "deep cuts" to America's nuclear arsenal.
So how "deep" is deep?
Well, right now the United States military has about 2,600 nuclear warheads deployed, with another 2,500 in reserve and 4,000 more that are scheduled to be dismantled.
But the Obama administration wants to change all that.
Barack Obama has been working hard to negotiate a deal with the Russians to reduce the nuclear arsenals of both the United States and Russia to 1,500 warheads.
However, the Obama administartion views those cuts as only a first step towards even larger cuts.
According to the Guardian, Barack Obama completely rejected the U.S. military's first draft of the "nuclear posture review".
So just why did Barack Obama reject the report?
According to reports it was far "too timid" for Obama.
Obama is not interested in slight cuts to America's nuclear arsenal.
Obama wants to almost completely eliminate it.
Instead of the arsenal of thousands of deployed nuclear warheads that the United States has now, the Obama administration envisions a U.S. nuclear arsenal with only a few hundred deployed nuclear warheads. Reportedly, the eventual goal is to completely abolish nuclear weapons altogether.
The Guardian quotes one anonymous European official as saying the following about how Barack Obama is approaching nuclear disarmament: "Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president's weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role."
What in the world?
Since when did the U.S. nuclear weapons that are protecting America become Barack Obama's weapons?
But apparently the Obama administration is convinced that "the Cold War" is over and that the U.S. will never need a large nuclear arsenal again.
However, the truth is that a large strategic nuclear arsenal is the only thing that has been keeping America safe for the past five or six decades. The Soviet Union had conventional military forces that were far larger than the U.S. had, and it was only our strategic weapons that kept them from attacking us or from trying to aggressively expand their empire into Europe.
But the threat of the Soviet Union is in the past, isn't it?
No, it is not.
The truth is that Russia is stronger today than it has been in ages, and now China has emerged as an ally of Russia and a very powerful strategic threat in their own right.
Part of the deal that Obama is negotiating with the Russians would allow the Russians to inspect U.S. nuclear sites.
If the U.S. dramatically reduces the size of their strategic nuclear arsenal, and if the Russians know exactly where those weapons are, it will be much easier to take out the vast majority of America's nukes in a devastating first strike.
So how would Russia do such a thing?
The truth is that Russia's next generation subs are so quiet that they can creep all the way up to U.S. coastlines without even being detected most of the time.
The U.S. military was certainly stunned recently to learn that two Russian nuclear submarines had been patrolling off the east coast of the United States.
According to news reports, two Akula class nuclear-powered submarines were lurking in international waters just 200 miles of the U.S. coast.
From such a position, subs such as those could rain nukes down on the United States in as little as 5 minutes.
According to the Times, Naval historian Norman Polmar considered this action by the Russians to be highly unusual: “I don’t think they’ve put two first-line nuclear subs off the US coast in about 15 years."
Russia has also recently resumed flying their strategic bombers along NATO borders. About these flights, Russia's deputy chief of general staff, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, recently said this:
"This is our right -- we felt bored making circles along our internal routes."
While the vast majority of the American people have no inkling of the Russian threat, the truth is that the Russian military has made a dramatic comeback.
Russia and China both view the United States as their number one enemy, and both nations have accelerated their military programs.
Meanwhile the U.S. pours all of its resources into trying to find terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Any terrorists hiding in caves in the Middle East are not the major threat that the United States should be concerned about.
What the U.S. should be concerned about is the super silent Russian subs that could one day rain down nukes on American cities.
In fact, quite a few modern prophets have prophesied that this is EXACTLY how the Russians will one day attack the United States.
For instance, the video posted below contains Henry Gruver's shocking vision of Russian submarines attacking the United States with nuclear missiles.....
Another example is found in this next video. The late Romanian prophet Dumitru Duduman was also given a vision of American cities being destroyed by nuclear weapons....
The reality is that the United States should be incredibly concerned about Russian submarines patrolling off the U.S. coastline.
But instead Barack Obama wants to strip the U.S. nuclear arsenal down to almost nothing in the name of "peace".
Well, the truth is that Barack Obama's "peace" could lead to the nuclear destruction of American cities someday.
If the prophets above are right, that is exactly what is going to happen.