The vast majority of average Americans never spend much time thinking about things like "population control" or "eugenics", but for the ultra-wealthy of the global elite and for the politicians that serve them, population control and eugenics are issues of the highest priority, and in fact it would be difficult to overstate the sick obsession that these elitists have with reducing the population of the planet.
Most of the time this sick obsession with population control does not make headlines, but a couple of recent news events has brought these issues back to the forefront once again. The first involved Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
In an absolutely stunning interview with the New York Times, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg alluded to the fact that abortion is all about getting rid of certain types of people that the elite do not want to have around:
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."
Now in what kind of sick world is it EVER acceptable to use the phrase "populations that we don't want to have too many of"?
That has got to be one of the most offensive statement made by any public figure in recent memory.
Yet the mainstream media has mostly let is pass without objection.
Fortunately, at least one member of Congress took notice. Representative Joseph Pitts, a Republican from Pennsylvania, gave a stirring speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives denouncing Ginsburg’s comment. If you have not seen his one minute speech addressing this yet, then you definitely need to watch this video:
Unfortunately, Ginsberg's comments are hardly an isolated case. The reality is that the top levels of government are filled with officials who are obsessed with population issues.
For example, John P. Holdren, Barack Obama's top science advisor co-authored a book in 1977 in which he advocated mass sterilization using the food and water supply, mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, forced abortions for American couples trying to have too many children and a global police force to enforce population control.
Really?
Yes, really.
Now keep in mind, this is Barack Obama's number one science advisor.
Holdren advocated these insane proposals in a 1977 textbook entitled "Ecoscience", which he co-authored with Paul Ehrlich (who worked in the Bush administration) and Anne Ehrlich.
When rumors of Holdren's book first began to surface, they were quickly dismissed by many because it just seemed so inconceivable that the top science advisor to the president of the United States would advocate such bizarre ideas.
However, once one blogger posted pictures of the pages of Holdren's book up on the Internet, people started to realize that Holdren actually did write these sick things.
What followers are some of the more shocking quotes from Holdren's book.
On page 837, the book states that compulsory abortion is perfectly legal under the Constitution of the United States:
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
On page 786, it says that single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government and that they could be forced to have abortions if the government decides that is what is best:
“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”
On pages 787 and 788, the book advocates the mass sterilization of humans by putting drugs in the food and water supply:
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
On pages 786 and 787, the authors discuss the involuntary sterilization of women after their second or third child:
Involuntary fertility control
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
On page 838, the authors state their belief that there is nothing wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size:
“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”
On pages 942 and 943, the authors call for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures:
Toward a Planetary Regime
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
On page 917, the authors advocate the surrender of national sovereignty to an armed international police force:
“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”
It would be easy to dismiss Holdren as an eccentric nutjob, but the truth is that his views are an accurate representation of what is commonly believed among the global elite. They are obsessed with the notion that this planet is massively overpopulated, and that if strict population control measures are not implemented quickly it will have catastrophic consequences for the planet.
Scientists who advocate eugenics and radical population control are funded and promoted by the global elite. In fact, prior to becoming Obama's top science advisor, Holdren was the Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
The truth is that academia is littered with nutjobs such as this who want to see the vast majority of humanity wiped out. Another example of this is Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka.
In an article entitled "What nobody wants to hear, but everyone needs to know", Pianka makes the following startling statements:
First, and foremost, we must get out of denial and recognize that Earth simply cannot support many billions of people
This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.
I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.
So the world "might" be able to support half a billion people?
What about all the rest of us?
Oh yeah, we apparently have to die.
But these nutjob scientists would not have the influence and positions they do if they were not funded by the ultra-wealthy global elitists who are also obsessed with population control.
On May 5th, 2009, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and a number of other ultra-wealthy Americans gathered for a super secret meeting in Manhattan. Reportedly the goal of the meeting was to evaluate how their combined wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population.
There was a total news blackout by the American media of this clandestine gathering. The group reportedly met at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and the president of Rockefeller University. The secret meeting supposedly so discreet that many of the billionaires’ aides were only told they were at "security briefings".
Fortunately, however, some details about the secret meeting have emerged.
According to one major U.K. newspaper, one anonymous person who attended the meeting said that "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat."
The same article included some other incredibly shocking quotes about the meeting from that same anonymous source.....
"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers."
"They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming."
So the super-wealthy "big-brains" are going to come up with the answers to overpopulation and impose those answers on the rest of us?
How arrogant can they possibly be?
You know all of that money that Bill Gates and Warren Buffett donated to "charity" some time ago? Well, the reality is that a whole lot of it is going for population control programs - especially in the third world.
The reality is that this secret meeting is just another example of the sick obsession that the global elite has with population control.
Even in the western world now it seems as though there is a non-stop program to promote abortion, sterilization, family size limits, lower birth rates and other even more extreme population control measures.
In fact, the chair of the U.K. government's Sustainable Development Commission, Jonathon Porritt, said that parents who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an "unbearable" burden on the environment.
Porritt also said that curbing population growth through abortion and contraception is absolutely necessary if the fight against global warming is going to be won.
And it is the "environmental movement" that is behind much of this. It is becoming increasingly popular to think of humans as a "virus" that are destroying the planet, and that what we need to do is to radically reduce the population to bring things back into balance.
For thousands of years, the freedom to marry and reproduce and to raise a family has been one of the most cherished and most basic of all human freedoms.
But now all of that is changing. Now you have governments like China that have implemented a "one child policy" and you have other governments that are starting to talk about limits on family sizes.
But even without formal government action, today there are many, particularly in the Western world, who are been convinced by government propaganda to willingly restrict their own reproductive capabilities.
For example, one 27 year old woman named Toni Vernelli told the Daily Mail why she decided to get permanently sterilized: "Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."
Some "environmental activists" have even gone to the absolute extreme by forming "The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement" which seeks to reduce the presence of humanity on earth completely.
Their motto is: “May we live long and die out”.
Doesn't that sound wonderful?
So is what they are saying true?
Is the ballooning population of the planet a huge threat to the environment?
Do we need to implement strict population control for the good of humanity?
The truth is that the world has more than enough space and resources for everyone if the elite were not so greedy, but instead the elite are pushing the governments of the world to implement population control programs.
We have started to see some of these population control measures begin to pop up in the Western world.....
*Women in the Netherlands who are deemed by the state to be unfit mothers will be sentenced to take contraception for a period of two years, according to a new bill before the Dutch parliament.
*In the U.K., one influential think tank says that it is an "eco-crime" to have too many childrenand that we really need to examine the impact our large population is having on the earth.
*In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.
Did you know that American tax dollars are being spent to sterilize the women of Peru?
The reality is that the desire by the global elite to limit the population of the earth has been around for centuries. Between 1798 and 1826, English economist Thomas Malthus published six editions of his work entitled "Essay on the Principle of Population", which argued that population growth inevitably outstrips food production.
The primary argument advanced by Malthus was that the English working class was poor not because they were exploited, but rather because there were way too many of them. Malthus opposed welfare and higher wages because he believed they would allow the poor to survive and breed, thus compounding the overpopulation problem and leading to more poverty. Of course Malthus was completely and totally wrong about all of this, but nonetheless his theories gained wide acceptance among the English elite of his day.
Many years later, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, vigorously promoted this type of twisted thinking in the United States. The following is one of Margaret Sanger's most infamous quotes:
"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Now keep in mind that this quote came out of the mouth of the founder of Planned Parenthood.
Unfortunately, the sick viewpoints of Malthus, Sanger and other population control advocates did not die out. Rather, they seemed to gain steam as the population of the world absolutely exploded in the 20th century.
U.S. environmentalist Paul Ehrlich, in his 1968 book entitled "The Population Bomb", argued for very strict population control measures, especially in the poorer areas of the world. He warned that if we did not implement such measures we would be facing catastrophic problems very quickly. Of course most of his dire predictions have now been documented to have been completely wrong, but his theories continue to wield a great deal of influence to this day.
Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, said this in 1984:
"Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village."
Unfortunately, the philosophies of Erlich, Schiotz and other population control advocates have garnered a substantial following even among powerful members of the United States government. Just check out the following shocking quotes from Thomas Ferguson, who formerly worked in the State Department Office of Population Affairs.....
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…."
“Our program in El Salvador didn’t work. The infrastructure was not there to support it. There were just too goddamned many people…. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females…."
“The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….”
Unfortunately, the quotes above are typical of the mindset of the global elite. The call for radical population control has grown louder than we have ever seen before. College professors are given standing ovations by their students when they call for a 90 percent reduction in the human population of the planet. Ted Turner makes the radical statement that, "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal," and the global elite applaud him for it. The Georgia Guidestones which call for us to "maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature" are increasingly cited by our leaders as an important, and perhaps even necessary, goal.
When did it become "a good idea" to wipe out 90 to 95 percent of mankind?
Even Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth, is obsessed with reducing population:
"You cannot keep a bigger flock of sheep than you are capable of feeding. In other words conservation may involve culling in order to keep a balance between the relative numbers in each species within any particular habitat. I realize this is a very touchy subject, but the fact remains that mankind is part of the living world…. Every new acre brought into cultivation means another acre denied to wild species."
Are you starting to understand how the global elite sees us?
The truth is that they see us as a "flock" that must be culled from time to time.
How incredibly sick is that?
In fact, Prince Philip, the "Eco-Warrior", also once said that he would like to come back to earth as a disease after he died to help reduce the human population.
But Prince Philip is far from alone on this issue. The call for human depopulation is coming from a myriad of other sources as well:
John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London has said this: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet."
He also made this shocking statement: “The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child.”
The infamous Club of Rome is certainly clear about who they think the "enemy" is.....
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
–Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991
Mikhail Gorbachev has also weighed in on his view on overpopulation. Many were stunned when he made this shocking statement: "We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."
The truth is that we are getting increasingly closer to the kind of world where the "useless eaters" that Henry Kissinger talked about will be "eliminated".
Is this the kind of future that you anticipated for your children and your grandchildren?
A world where the human "flock" is regularly "culled" to please the global elite?
Not that it matters that the world is not even experiencing runaway population growth.
While the earth's population is indeed growing, the rate of growth is definitely slowing. The population of the world grew by 140% between 1950 and 2000. However, authorities are predicting a rise of only 50% between 2000 and 2050, and a rise of just 11% in the 50 years beyond that.
In fact, in Russia they are actually starting to pay people to have children because the population there has been declining too much.
But the global elite have decided that the earth should only have about 500 million people, and that they are going to have to get rid of about 90 percent of us.
And one of the truly sad things is that many of you who will read this article actually agree with the global elite. Many of you believe that we need sterilization, family size limits, forced abortion and even more draconian measures in order to avoid an environmental catastrophe.
The truth is that you have been brainwashed.
The truth is that you have been lied to.
The truth is that you have bought into a philosophy of death which completely devalues human life.
But this is what is being taught in universities all over the United States and Europe. The population control and eugenics agenda of the global elite is being being propagandized by professors, scientists and government officials who have bought into this madness.
However, what most people do not realize is that the global elite not only intend to theorize about population control and eugenics. They fully intend to radically reduce the population of the earth in their lifetimes - whether you like it or not.
Rampant population growth threatens our economy and quality of life. I’m not talking about the obvious environmental and resource issues. I’m talking about the effect upon rising unemployment and poverty in America.
I should introduce myself. I am the author of a book titled “Five Short Blasts: A New Economic Theory Exposes The Fatal Flaw in Globalization and Its Consequences for America.” To make a long story short, my theory is that, as population density rises beyond some optimum level, per capita consumption of products begins to decline out of the need to conserve space. People who live in crowded conditions simply don’t have enough space to use and store many products. This declining per capita consumption, in the face of rising productivity (per capita output, which always rises), inevitably yields rising unemployment and poverty.
This theory has huge implications for U.S. policy toward population management. Our policies that encourage high rates of population growth are rooted in the belief of economists that population growth is a good thing, fueling economic growth. Through most of human history, the interests of the common good and business (corporations) were both well-served by continuing population growth. For the common good, we needed more workers to man our factories, producing the goods needed for a high standard of living. This population growth translated into sales volume growth for corporations. Both were happy.
But, once an optimum population density is breached, their interests diverge. It is in the best interest of the common good to stabilize the population, avoiding an erosion of our quality of life through high unemployment and poverty. However, it is still in the interest of corporations to fuel population growth because, even though per capita consumption goes into decline, total consumption still increases. We now find ourselves in the position of having corporations and economists influencing public policy in a direction that is not in the best interest of the common good.
The U.N. ranks the U.S. with eight third world countries – India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bangladesh, Uganda, Ethiopia and China – as accounting for fully half of the world’s population growth by 2050.
If you’re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, I invite you to visit either of my web sites at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com or PeteMurphy.wordpress.com where you can read the preface, join in my blog discussion and, of course, purchase the book if you like. (It’s also available at Amazon.com.)
Please forgive the somewhat spammish nature of the previous paragraph. I just don’t know how else to inject this new perspective into the overpopulation debate without drawing attention to the book that explains the theory.
Pete Murphy
Author, “Five Short Blasts”
Have you seen the new film: Maafa21. That well documented DVD is astounding proving the eugenic and racist roots of Planned Parenthood and abortion. It is a MUST SEE for everyone no matter what you view of abortion is. See how African Americans are the target of these population control groups and why Planned Parenthood leads the charge. See original quotes, documents and clipping on the collaboration between the American Eugenics Society, Margaret Sanger ( Founder of Planned Parenthood) , many of the board of Planned Parenthood and the United States Government – both Republicans and Democrats who have worked systematically to target these groups that Ginsburg speaks about today ! The Maafa ( Tragedy) is not over. Watch how the racist attitudes regarding slavery led to Eugenics and to birth control and abortion today. Get a sneak peak of Maafa21 here: http://www.maafa21.com
Sorry, but your quite right, I do agree with population control.
Human Beings are a cancer on this earth.
I’ve quoted those quotations of Holdren on Jeremiah Films page Discerning Science • Origins • Darwin Eugenics
pete murphy and julie carol are sick persons who defy their creator….the lord commanded us to be fruitful and multiply because we are created in the image and likeness of god….
…unfortunately we have failed to do that and world population is forecasted to decline starting c. 2050….europe is already de-populating….america would have begun if not for massive illegal immigration….
if julie carol truly believed what she said she would immediately commit suicide and kill as much of her family as possible…as it stands she has not done that and exposes herself for the complete fraud and hater that she is…
the world is capable of supporting much larger populations than it currently has….the hoax of global warming and population explosion are ruses by the elite to destroy the plebeians of whom you are a member absent sufficient education or wealth….
obama supports murdering babies and adults…his voting record as senator speaks powerfully for it as the ONLY bill he ever worked for was to make it a crime to assist babies who survived abortion.
For thousands of years the human population has hovered at just under 1 billion with people most of the time free to have as many children as they wanted. But the population did not grow because only a fraction of children born ever lived long enough to become parents themselves. Life for nearly all was “nasty, short and brutal”. In the last two hundred years many things have changed with the discoveries of new medicines, fertilizers and energy production. For many of us in the west things have improved beyond recognition and we no longer live such a brutal way of life but are concerned to see perhaps some sixth of our fellow human beings failing to make the progress we have enjoyed. There are many reasons why this is so, corrupt governments and war are an obvious cause. But when one studies cases in Africa for instance, it is clear that the opportunities that held so much promise at the time of independence have been squandered, by ruling elites plundering natural resources to lead the life of the super rich, but also by the relentless growth in population which are overwhelming even the most dedicated governments . Africa has achieved a growth rate of about 2.5% over the last 50 years, despite wars and corruption, and much higher over some periods. This would have been enough to triple the standard of living there, but this has all been consumed and more by the size of the population increase.
The situation there now looks bleak, after 50 years the situation is worse now than at the time of independence, it appears that having seen so little benefit from the meagre development aid so far invested, that any further investment effort will simply be dissipated in further population increase, war and corruption. In South Africa, despite massive progress in the education system, all that is happening is that the unemployed are better educated with vacancies for perhaps only 10% of school leavers. Progress is being made but the South African government has to run to stand still in the rising population tide. The situation of the bottom billion can be advanced, but the problems are enormously difficult, and population control is just one of the vital weapons that may provide some purchase on the problem. If parents can be assured of the survival of their children and of their security in old age, then they might be persuaded to contribute to the advancement of their children’s generation by acting responsibly to limit the size of their own families.
We are not animals who have to ensure the survival of their species by creating an excess of children in order to ensure sufficient survive to maximally exploit the opportunities afforded by the environment. As humans we have rights but also responsibilities and if we exercise those responsibilities we can live in dignity, but if we only focus on our right to procreate, then some of us may loose the right to a life of dignity. That is just an inevitable consequence, not a right wing plot of the elite.
Do you remember when the USA had UNDER 200 million people within its 50 states? (Hint: it was less than 50 years ago.) Now we have nearly 350 million within the same borders! That’s a 75% increase (from an already unsustainable level of 1960). Eventually the proverbial excrement is going to hit the fan; better to reduce our population VOLUNTARILY now rather than have it forced down our throats by a worldwide famine, which will surely come sooner rather than later….
Tony,
Julie Carol’s comments are absurd, but whilst Pete Carol’s may be a little unconventional he is not “sick” for pointing out that there are powerful reasons to suppose that population growth contributes to the ability of the rich elite to exploit the poor. I do not believe that God intended us to live on a planet where a tiny rich elite could live in perfect comfort whilst the vast majority were obliged to lead shallow empty lives, deprived of the opportunity to experience the richness of human existence because of the oppression and exploitation by a selfish elite. You guys really have to think this all through before you react to the kind of provocation that the material in maaf21 is bound to cause. Such material is utterly obnoxious.
However, there are also equally unworthy reasons why unrestrained population growth might be promoted. It may further the interests of a particular tribal, religious or ethnic group, particularly in unsophisticated “democracies” where election results are determined by group loyalty rather than reasoned argument. This results in a version of the prisoner’s dilemma where pursuit of self interest is self defeating and results in losses for all.
paul –
you are a magnificent sophist cum apoligist for eugenics and population control. unfortunately you fail to persuade me.
to aver that social and political inequities justify population control is the most condescending and vile tripe i could imagine.
the poor ye shall have with you always. and why is that so? it is because every social injustice is a challenge and opportunity for the privileged and affluent to apply his talents and riches to alleviate the condition of the poor – indeed that is salvation – from the lord’s mouth to your ears. it is precisely what yahushua did when he assumed corpulence to descend to earth and then into the graves to empty them all so that we might have life and have it more abundantly.
democracy is as corrupt a system of oppression in the presence of universal suffrage as is any other. obama is president not because of democratic triumph but because of plutocratic largesse and political purpose.
the lord commanded us to be fruitful and multiply without implying recklessness….but there is no human anywhere who has the wisdom to manage population control – such is the vain imaginations of arrogance and of the antichrist. humans replicate the divine image. an attack on population growth is an attack upon the creator himself and will of course yield to his judgment and triumph at armageddon.
you don’t like the poor or the mentally feeble? too bad – they are the lord’s people whom he will protect. woe to the rulers who rule unjustly and speak falsely of the lord.
the lord’s plan will proceed – interfere with it at your own peril.
Overpopulation is NOT a global problem: It is the problem of EACH country, to be solved by that country. If a country’s population has doubled in the last 20 years and it now needs international food aid to feed 10 million of its people, that country must admit that it needs something like China’s one-child family system to bring their population back to a manageable level.
The heads of state of countries needing massive food aid must be brought before the General Assembly of the UN so that this simple thing can be explained to them.
We are not united but seperated and diverted, and then we have these money systems, which turns everything upside down, and leads to massive waste of resources, quality, visdom and common sense.
We are going down backwards because of a profit-based system controlled by the few, which is not in any way in harmony with human nature!
We were not slaves originally, but because of the passification of humanity through genetic altering, manipulation, illusions and lies, we are now standing today face to face, with a conspiracy so monstrous, that we as individuals are handicapped in the shadow of that machine.
Joseph Moshe H5N1 Ukraine Plague Warning
The Baxter Scandal:
torontosun.com
bloomberg.com
reuters.com
greetings
I propose that all those infavor of population controll
by drastic measures ‘ should start with themself and their
family, – and we won’t stop them.
peace
If we, human beings, do not value human life, then what else is there that has value? The human being was created as the highest being in the physical world. Respect for human life and for all life should be our highest value. Otherwise, why should civilization go on? Couples fall in love and marry; mothers give birth and nourish their young; fathers work to support their families. Societies must be based on the principle and unifying force of love; without love, there would be selfishness and chaos. People would be motivated by fear or compulsion.
I do not see proof that there is overpopulation. There are still large areas of unpopulated land in the world. Technology is more advanced every day; through technology, more food can be grown, and there can be new sources of energy. Millions of people in the world are starving, but this is more on account of political reasons than overpopulation. There is an answer to everything, but the elite are trying to play God. We must always strive to do what is the right thing–the end never justifies the means.
The above are just some of my thoughts.
The only problem i have with drastic population control is it returning the world to the pre-ww1/2 period, and whats to stop those type of conflicts happening again?
To my knowledge there has never been any case where mass starvation occured as a result of overpopulation. In every case that I can think of there has been a natural disaster, war or political factor that were the key. If there are any examples to the contrary, then feel free to advise me.
The proponents of population control are no different than the mindless
Neanderthal Nazi Germans who ruined Europe in the name of the “Herrenvolk.” The so-called global elites simply hate human beings. Ironically, they are totally self-destructive because their parasitical existence is based on the exploitation of the masses which they despise.
Ted Turner, Al Gore, Prince Philip, David Rockefeller and their “academic” stooges like Elrich and Holdren are mean-spirited degenerates who have no sense of humanity about them. They make life miserable for the rest of us by hoarding wealth that was often acquired by highly questionable means. Their self-serving egotism is the true enemy of “mother Earth.”
Jesus, please come back soon! The world has gone mad!
Shawn, there are not “350 million” people in America. The true figure is 305 million (1/2010) Huge difference. This is the problem with these people, they do not even have their *facts* correct.
Eugenist should lead by example.
That is how a craze is started put the brainwashing in the media (repeated a million times) and suddenly everyone wants it, does it, or wears it!
To Viv:
I agree that we should value human life, but to consider ourselves the highest beings on the planet is ridiculous. In order to live on this earth we must consider ourselves equal to our fellow creatures and live sustainably with them. The way we live now is not sustainable, and recognizing options such as population control, though I dont agree with many of the more radical proposals, is crucial.
Only humans would have the hubris to consider themselves the highest beings on the planet. Humans have been causing the majority of the destruction of the planet in the first place between all the wars, pollution, oil spills, overpopulation and so on. In a way, we are a cancer, a blight to planet earth. Are we really contributing anything to the planet. We seem much more concerned about ourselves and our selfish consumption. I am an advocate for the depopulation plan, but only if the global elite start with the culling of themselves first.
@ Frank (1.4.2010)
So because Shawn figured the US population is 350 million instead of the true figure of 305, his viewpoint is discounted? That’s absurd. How juvenile to throw out his point because he mis-figured. His point is that the US population is growing too fast to be supported and this trend is being followed to even more dire degrees in other countries around the world.
Frank, you’re a fool. Do the species a favor and avoid reproduction.
@ Chris M (11.27.2009) Civilizations that are wiped out by war or disaster are thus destroyed because a lack of resources has put them on the precipice of extinction. Countries go to war because of lack of resources for too many people; nations are thwarted by a bad winter or draught becuase a large population has out-stripped their resources and a bad harvest is the straw that breaks their back.
Stop defending the Bible. The fact is there are too many people on Earth and just becuase your tome says to “go forth and multiply” does not mean it’s the best thing for the people of this planet. In fact, more people on Earth means more misery.
Get over yourselves and gain some perspective you myopic children.
At the risk of sounding like an elitist jackass, I agree with population control, and believe that every person should be sterilised from birth until they show themselves capable of being a parent. It’s rare to see the news nowadays without hearing about some adult or other who has abused their child, often to the point of being dangerous to their health or even to their death. Too many times, these stories mention the fact that the government has stepped in, but failed to notice that these children were in serious danger.
Our world simply cannot support many more people without serious reform to our government and to the public way of thinking. Unfortunately, it’s the same people who are often without the resources to support many children who opt to have them because they “love” kids, without one thought to the already-born unwanted children bouncing around foster homes. I know no family with legally adopted children, but I know many people who would be quick to condemn someone who chooses to have an abortion, and tries to push her to give up her child for adoption instead.
Consider, for a moment, a world where families only have as many children as they have the resources to look after, without relying on welfare support; consider a world where children are born to families prepared for them, that know how to look after children satisfactorily (the basics, like feeding and changing their diapers and the like). Consider a world where no child ever has to starve because their country simply does not have the resources to support them along with the rest of the population (I’m looking at you, Africa). Consider a world where crime is no longer a viable option for children born into poor families, to support themselves. A world where every child is adequately cared for, and no child dies because their waste-of-air parent neglected them.
Doesn’t sound so bad now, does it?
Oh, and for the record: my boyfriend and I do not intend to have children. We have the resources, but none of the desire, and frankly, I don’t much care to have my taxes be paying for someone else’s inability to use prophylactics.
Here Is A Quote Created By Me. Please Let Me Know What You All Think Of It.
Here It Is:
“Anyone who do not have compassion for others is severely mentally ill and deranged and need to be locked up because they are just as dangerous as those who become serial killers”
Created By Me theNWOsucks
its all about medicine
be a natural being and live your life and be gone. noting brutal about that. do you think God put medicine on this Earth for just our generation and not others? does he favor our generation over others? or is it just a time where we have this power and is it being used wisely, as Christians, ask yourself what is the purpose of medicine, did God want us to take it or is that created by the imperfect man? tell me what i want to know, find out on your own and be a person that is in line with the Gospel saying that if you have the opportunity to do something good and dont do it, it is a sin, so if you are watching tv right now, or have ever wasted a second in your life, you have sinned. i beleive that true christians have not been around or are not in the church because if you live in America and are fine with the status quo, you are NOT A CHRISTIAN!!! get with it.
but anyways just asking the christians, what do you think about medicine?
I just want to point out that these quotes and the ‘book’ mentioned are a TEXTBOOK, the scenarios being criticized are an academic review of all possible methods that have been attempted or theorized throughout the world throughout history. The authors are not advocating the views, they are explaining how they come to be so the reader can learn. Maybe the author of this post could use an education as well.
If we ignore all the parts of human history that we disagree with we loss the opportunity to learn from them and avoid them. Ignorance of the past can only lead to repetition, you should praise these authors for examining Eugenics and other strategies so students who will be making these decisions in the next generations understand the history and consequences of their choices.
Excelent article.Living in Brazil I can tell you first hand whatsover we are dealing with.
First there are more than enough natural resources to feed 10 billion human beings or more.
Problem is GREED.Greed from people that imagine themselves God,but simultaneously hold in their hands the keys for food.There are 5 edible beans gigantic corporations controlling basic food stuff in the world,invariable linked with the jewish Banking Cartels.
There exist all over the world,be it ‘first’ or ‘third’ world a network of parasitic middlemen inflating food prices,generating surpluses or scarcity at their conviniency.
And there is the Wall Street gambling futures and derivatives and the food stuff pricing in New York and London for most of the world’s food production.
So,if somebody wants to artificially rise food pricing it is a simple Bourse maneouver to purchase,transport and stock huge amounts of a given commodity to increse pricing(as was done recently by one man in Europe,with coffee).
Meanwhile,small farmers over the ‘third’ world starve with ever diminishing profits from their hard working fields.
And urban settlers are left empty handed for their meager daily nourishment due to unbounded GREED.
Second,the problem of premature pregnancy do exist in our countries,especially in Brazil,if you are concious enough you’ll discover that is not lack of information or simple animalistic behaviour.
It is a well socially engineered plan that has destroyed minimal moral concern and acceptable civilized conduct on the part of a growing percentage of our youth.
Media constantly flash sexuality ,immorality,lack of preservation of spiritual values in exchange for fashionable indescent dressing,music,dance,foreign tendencies,acceptance of unatural customs like gay marriage or worse homosexual apology ,family destruction through the minimization of normal marriage value,systematic destruction of the father figurehead(Simpsons,etc),extreme materialistic messages (selling the idea of cosmetic beauty for reaching higher social status),political oportunism that ends in ever worse education(even university),health care,etc.
Now I’ll ask you who controls media,all television channels,all radio stations,all printing houses,all the imaginable sources of marketing and propaganda…
Who finances,clean and favours drug traffic with it enormous social tragedy,so prevalent in our midst?
Who made that poor ‘favelada’ a precocious prostitute,selling her body for small change to feed herself and her many relatives?
Who made her “head” as to accept been a wretched human being and worse of all …pregnant?
If one is counting the increased population in the U.S., how about factoring in the immigration issue? Instead of killing people, limit the number of immigrants admitted. But then who is going to help process the food from the fields? How many Americans are beating their breasts to work in hot, torrid, fields…if we are going to be honest. At least immigrants want to work. Many Americans are happy to live on welfare and not work. Just one perspective.
St. Timothy (?) said “the love of money is the root of all evil.” Truth is a constant, it does not alter.
Population is not the problem, losing the moral conscience God gave us IS.
I cannot understand why the billionaries should care how many people are on the earth. They can go buy an island and have leisure all by themselves whenever they want.
As for overpopulation: it is a myth. No space? Ever drive through west Texas or Wyoming or Nevada?
Europe is depopulating itself. Japan is too. The consequences are incredible. Not to worry; there is something coming to fill the void and it is called islam. Don’t want to be Christian? No morals and ‘rules’ or even natural law wanted? No worry; islam is coming and they will tell you how to behave or they will kill you. There, overpopulation solved.
In the meanwhile, murdering the unborn and the ‘undesirables’ is not the answer. And our earthly life is not all there is. Did you know that humans are composed of body and soul, and that the soul lives forever. The taking of innocent lives as some propose is the death of the soul for those who do it. And there is always a consequence to the evil. Always. Some might think they are getting away with it for now. But there is eternity. Hell is real, it is hot, and it lasts forever.
Well Mr. Holdren and “ALL” the other “CRAZY MADE” global power elites, if YOU ALL believe so strongly in YOUR CAUSE that humans hurt the earth, do the rest of us a favor and take OWN ADVICE…”HYPOCRITS”!!!!!!!!!! Sorry, I’m not killing myself “today” because YOU ALL suggested it! One thing is for sure power, money and influence pedaling HAS made you all “S-T-U-P-I-D” as well as “CRAZY”!!!!!
People who hold signs “save the planet, kill yourself” should practice what they preach. Ironic how it’s okay to take away a life as long as it not them suffering. As for economy, it’s threathened by rich people who abuse money instead of placing it into good use. There is plenty to go around but people stuff till they can’t sh*t it out (and those are the same people who are demanding population control so they can hoard more than their a*s can handle)
Looking at the TFR (Total Fertility Rate) numbers taken from the CIA Factbook and UN, I cannot for the life of me understand how this stawman known as Over Population continues to attract so many people. The data is out there for all to see. And the data paints a worrisome situation all right. But it isn’t Over Population, but Under Population that is in our future.
The TFR for the globe peaked in the early 1970s at 6.0 children per female. In 2000 the global TFR was 2.6 . That is a wholesale drop of a magnitude of over 50% in just one generation. Today, in Europe the TFR is 1.8 (1.5 discounting the Muslim population). Greece, Italy, Spain, Estonia, and Russia all have TFRs at 1.1 or less. At the 1.1 TFR number, the population begins to halve itself every generation. In Japana, the TFR is 1.1 to 1.3 . In China, the TFR averages only 1.3 . In North America the US has a TFR of 2.0 (1.7 excluding immigration). In Canada it is 1.5 . In Mexico the TFR was 6.8 in 1968, 3.0 in 1980. But now sits at 2.1. It has been decelerating for almost 40 years. Even in the more fecund South America, the TFR has plunged from 4.0 in 1970 to less than 2.2 today. In 1970 Thailand had a TFR of 6.1; today it is less than 1.7 . Africa continues to have a TFR of over 3.5 . But in North Africa and South Africa the TFRs are below 2.1 . Even in Arab nations like Iran, Turkey, and Saud Arabia and Jordan the TFRs are plunging. Only in Yeman and Afghanistan are TFRs above 6.0 .
We continue to debate an abstraction known as Over Population, when in fact the world will see a drop in population after 2040, not a rise. If the trend continues, the global TFR will go below 2.1 in 20 years. By 2110, the global population could very well be less than it is today.
What the power elite wants to do is written on the 19 feet tall Georgia Guide Stones, located in Elberton, Georgia for all to see:
MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE
GUIDE REPRODUCTION WISELY — IMPROVING FITNESS AND DIVERSITY
UNITE HUMANITY WITH A LIVING NEW LANGUAGE
RULE PASSION — FAITH — TRADITION AND ALL THINGS WITH TEMPERED REASON
PROTECT PEOPLE AND NATIONS WITH FAIR LAWS AND JUST COURTS
LET ALL NATIONS RULE INTERNALLY RESOLVING EXTERNAL DISPUTES IN A WORLD COURT
AVOID PETTY LAWS AND USELESS OFFICIALS
BALANCE PERSONAL RIGHTS WITH SOCIAL DUTIES.
PRIZE TRUTH — BEAUTY — LOVE — SEEKING HARMONY WITH THE INFINITE
BE NOT A CANCER ON THE EARTH — LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE — LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE
in the following 12 languages, Sanskrit, Babylonian Cuneiform, Egyptian Hieroglyphics and Classical Greek, English, Russian, Hebrew, Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Spanish, and Swahili.
I can hardly believe what I am reading! Doesn’t anyone believe we have a soul (not snakes, mosquitos or other creaturs … just humans), and that its Satan’s desire to destroy what God creates? Who would willingly cooperate with Satan, intentionally killing souls, physically or spiritually (other than the elite)?
All of the world’s population can live in the State of Texas, not elbow to elbow, but room to live, breathe, move around. If we can send a man to the moon and back, alive, why can’t we better use the world’s knowledge, research & resources to benefit all. It’s because of the greed of the world’s elite who lust after power, wealth, etc. One home and a second vacation home with one boat, one car for each driver in the family is not enough … they have to have more and more and more and still are not satisfied. Check out Ted Turner, founder of CNN, and one of the foremost proponents of population control and reduction … he has been buying up vast areas of Montana … for what? For his control, for his kingdom … and of course unpopulated … so who’s contributing to population crowding? The other thing is that they want unfettered access to the world’s natural resources to exploit for their own financial gain … so what do they do? Cause wars/famine, etc. to clear out opposition, gain control of the areas and then leach out the regions natural resourcesd … Read “Hope of the Wicked” by Ted Flynn … it will open your eyes.
FEWER CHILDREN, LESS WEALTH
by Ettore Gotti Tedeschi
If there is no respect for life, then what deserves respect? I believe that the essential message of “Caritas in Veritate” is this: an instrument – like the economy, science, and technology – cannot and must not claim moral autonomy; that would cause irreparable harm for man, as has in fact happened. And this happens when man loses the meaning of truth and subjects the truth to his own freedom, which, in the Catholic view, is disordered. The moral autonomy of an instrument is a symptom of confusion and of loss of the truth. The result is that human life itself loses its meaning, human dignity loses its value, and man becomes a means of production, of consumption, of efficiency.
Negating life or subordinating it to other presumed values truly produces irreparable harm. For this reason I clearly affirm that the origin of the current crisis is above all moral, and is due precisely to the negation of life. Let’s remember that at the end of the 1960′s, the neo-Malthusian “prophets” (first those of Stanford University, then those of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) announced that, if the rate of population growth were to continue as in previous years (around 4-4.5 percent), before 2000 hundreds of millions (a figure later reduced to tens of millions) of people would die of hunger, above all in India and other parts of Asia. This says a great deal about the predictive capacities of sociologists and economists; in fact, what happened afterward completely contradicts their assumptions. In the Western world, which brought the birth rate below the replacement level, the conditions for crisis were created, while in the emerging world, which has continued to have children, there has instead been development and the creation of wealth. We Westerners believed that we would become more wealthy by negating life, and instead we have become more poor.
And look at what has happened. If the population of a rich and expensive country stops growing, the result is a progressive reduction of the access of young people to the phase of productivity; at the same time, there is an increase in the number of people leaving productive activities and becoming a cost for the collective. This population, then, decreases in both number and resources. In practice, fixed costs rise in the socio-economic system, and since taxes cannot be cut, saving and financial activity diminish.
The most natural reaction at that point is to increase productivity (which in practice is equivalent to increasing the number of hours worked), but this has a physical limit. Of course, one can try systems that seek to increase purchasing power by reducing costs (for example, by transferring much of the production to Asia). But when this is not enough, there is only one means left: debt. Or more accurately, debt-fueled consumption, which arrives at the excesses that we know. The fact is that the abnormal expansion of credit and the poor use of financial instruments were effects, not causes. The origin of the current economic imbalances must be sought elsewhere: in the lack of respect for human life. [. . .]
In the countries that twenty years ago were considered “developing,” the increase in population has brought them today, thanks in part to new production facilities, enough wealth and prosperity to support our formerly wealthy and childless countries. These countries are now investing in areas that we Westerners have always considered chronically impoverished, and we have “helped” them by sending them condoms to stop the growth of their populations. It is estimated that in Africa, which is being colonized by the Chinese, there could be a couple million inhabitants within a dozen years. The Chinese are investing in this, creating jobs and promoting prosperity. The problem, if anything, will be what culture and what view of the dignity of man these new colonizers will bring among those populations. One thing is sure: they won’t be Catholic.
_____________
The book:
Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, Rino Camilleri, “Denaro e paradiso. I cattolici e l’economia globale”, Lindau, Torino, 2010, pp. 160, euro 15,00.
Wow. I am totally blown away at how many people commenting on this article are disgusted with humanity. May I remind you that YOU also are part of the human race. If you are so intent on getting rid of humanity…may I suggest you start with yourselves? I almost laughed at the ludicrousness of getting rid of the population. You very ones that want to get rid of people ARE part of the population! Let’s start with you…shall we? You be the ones to start the “depopulation” with yourselves since you have such a need to “save” the environment. Really…to put the environment before human lives? Do you not use resources as well? Do you not eat, drink and use resources like the rest of humanity? What gives YOU the right to decide who dies and YOU live. LOL! What massive egos! Really…you should be ashamed of yourselves……….and might I add that you should count yourselves lucky that your own mothers didn’t decide that fate for YOU!
“If there is no God, everything is Permitted” – Destovesky.
The whole problems of the entire world from the beginning of the 20th Century can be summarized in one sentence said Alexander Scholentizyn in his commencement address to Harvard University.
“They have forgotten God”
God can do without Man, but can Man live without God?
not live as in subsist, but thrive and be fully alive like he is supposed to be?
Without God, we return to Darwinian standards, either explicitly or implicitly.
I think it is too late for the World to return to any sort of standards of morality, the masses are not intellectuals and are easily swayed by public media elites and sensate culture.
The happiest period on earth was in the Catholic High Middle Ages, contrary to popular opinion.
——————————————————————
“How many winds of doctrine have we known in recent decades, how many ideological currents, how many ways of thinking. The small boat of the thought of many Christians has often been tossed about by these waves – flung from one extreme to another: from Marxism to liberalism, even to libertinism; from collectivism to radical individualism; from atheism to a vague religious mysticism; from agnosticism to syncretism and so forth. Every day new sects spring up, and what St Paul says about human deception and the trickery that strives to entice people into error (cf. Eph 4: 14) comes true.
Today, having a clear faith based on the Creed of the Church is often labeled as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be “tossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrine”, seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desires” – Pope Benedict XVI
I as well know that The Lord Almighty is not pleased with this elitist crowd who think that they can play God. They are idiot Savants, all of them. So sad to see the devil in their details and they remaining so clueless about the reality of the spiritual realm and the passing temporal nature of life on Earth. The meaning of life is to get to Heaven and share in the glory and peace of God. God is coming very soon now…so say the legitimate visionaries. But first, this evil must reach it’s zenieth and play out. For thos who have eyes…we need to be praying and fasting and turning our wills over to the Lord and let Him deal with these clueless ones.
If you were to take all of humanity and place them all in Texas, each person would have about an acre of land. And the rest of the world would be available. Satan wants us to believe that we are overcrowded. But the truth is that this planet could support 100 billion people easily…IF we all followed God’s tenants and loved one another as brothers and sisters. Sadly, the ones who preach population control are the ones who are clueless about death and sin and eternal hell…which is where they will end up if they don’t wise up. Jesus Christ has risen…he has risen indeed!!!!!
You ask: “Who would willingly cooperate with Satan, intentionally killing souls, physically or spiritually (other than the elite)?” ??!! Why, SATANISTS! And that is what the ‘Elie’ are…if the shoe fits….
We have underpopulation with growth of abortion and contraception.Have a look at the world- except for few cities in each country- our world is one MIDDLE OF NOWHERE with thousands of kilometers of emptiness that could otherwise be inhabited and cared for by people.Unfortunately millions have been either aborted or prevented from coming into this world, by usage of contraception.
I would encourage everyone to purchase, watch and share the documentary film “MAAFA21″ – go to MAAFA21.com. This is a must see for all because it documents the history, beginning with the end of the Civil War, the people behind eugenics, abortion, sterilization and genocide. Hitler actually got many of his ideas from the American Eugenics Society. It will open your eyes!
Yes, Ray………..there ARE some of us who do!!!
MARY MOST HOLY, OUR BELOVED MOTHER AND QUEEN OF HEAVEN, MEDIATRIX OF ALL GRACES…..HAVE MERCY ON US AND FORGIVE US.
PROTECT AND DEFEND US FROM THE ENEMIES OF YOUR SON, JESUS CHRIST!!!
CRUSH THE HEAD OF THY SON’S ENEMIES, ALL SPIRITUAL, TEMPORAL AND SECULAR!!!
REIGN DOWN GRACES AND MERCIES UPON A NEEDY, MORALLY CORRUPT AND BANKRUPT WORLD!
……..St MICHAEL DEFEND US IN BATTLE!…………….SALVE REGINA
The only “cancer” on this earth are the elite and their brainwashed prodigy who advocate population control. They should be the first in line to “volunteer”. As for the huge increase in the U.S. population of the past 50 years there are two major culprits: Anchor babies from all the illegals allowed by the eugenics promoting government to freely pour into this nation and all the illegitmate children produced to gain government welfare handouts. Not to mention the sexually liberal culture both CREATED and ENCOURAGED by the same eugenics promotion government/elite that want to “reduce” the population. Either these elite are total hypocrites or there is another underlying agenda here. I have my ideas but I’ll leave it at that. At any rate, I’m certain that this world is plenty big enough for everyone, or it would be if not for the “hoarders” at the top of the Luciferian pyramid who have sold their souls for money and power. I’m glad that I follow Jesus Christ and my kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36). It’s a lot easier to observe what’s happening when you climb outside the deceptive box the elite have built around you. I’ll leave you with a few subject appropriate quotes that should lead anyone with a modicum of intelligence to see the “big picture” which is how we have been led around throughout history with a hook in our noses by these elite:
“For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.” Professor Carrol Quigley
“The few who could understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of the people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” John Sherman
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the [public] is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” Edward Bernays (Father of modern media and nephew of Sigmund Freud).
“No matter how paranoid or conspiracy-minded you are, what the government is actually doing is far worse than you imagine.” William Blum
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”, and also, “The greater the lie, the greater the chance that it will be believed” Adolph Hitler (Eugenics promotor)
“The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, or preventing all possibility of its continuing as a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” — President Teddy Roosevelt, 1902.
“The task is to covertly lower the standard of living, the whole social structure, of America so that we can be merged with all other nations.” Rowan Gaither
“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” — Dresden James
“By taxing and parceling out more than a third of what Americans produce, through regulations that reach deep into American life, our ruling class is making itself the arbiter of wealth and poverty.” conservative editor and writer Angelo M. Codevilla
“It was not accidental [the 1929 stock-market “crash”]. It was a carefully contrived occurrence. … The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.” Louis McFadden
“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American’s freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight.” JFK
“All we need it the right major crises and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller 1994
It’s most revealing that these pseudo-elites are contemplating reducing our population and eliminating 90-95% of us; “thinning us out,” as it were. Do such imbeciles ever think that their ranks deserve to be thinned out, as well? Why do they think that they are the ubermenschen in this world, the rest of us being mere underlings that need to be gotten rid of like excess cattle? What absurd pride! Wealth and power must cause one to become a degenerate in desperate need of a good culling.
The rest of you who agree with population reduction, forced abortions, euthanasia, and so on: why don’t you put your money where your rather large mouths are and start with yourselves? Starve yourselves like what is being done in Africa. Euthanize yourselves like you want to do with the sick and elderly. Sterilize yourselves, realize yourselves as the parasites you think the rest of us are. In truth, you are no different than the rest of us: we’re all humans, worthy of the same life. If 95% of us are “unworthy of life,” then so are you. So stop being a hypocrite and do something about it!
Lead by example, ignorant blue-bloods.
Julie, believes – it is obvious, that all humans which are not herself – are cancers. For as someone else said — otherwise she would off herself immediately. How sad your life must be — but there is always hope.
I am 100% anti-abortion, and have not one iota of a belief in over-population nonsense…it is MAN that has starved man, limited relief and assistance – time and again. This GOD created earth can and would provide for us ALL – we hamper this, and we will answer for it.
I am concerned about the Ginsburg quote — as the whole of it reads: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”
My understanding of what she said – is that how it SEEMED it was going to work — forcing certain *types* to have abortions, but that in the end — how the case turned out was not *forcing* any one — she said “the case came out the other way” — and while, yes – she does think Gov’t should not be involved – and should women want an abortion they should have that right, but no one is/was forced.
In our fight against wrong/evil — we must not misquote, or re-interpret words!! The truth is the truth is the TRUTH!!
Well said, Thomas. Blue bloods jump into the clift to hell where all of you belong and be no more! and let us, son and daughters of God live in better world in peace, joy and prosperity.
Beautiful prayer Donna, and I said so be it!
Sly is totally right. Texas will accomodate everyone…but I would leave the blue-bloods out! Jim Marrs, an amazing writer, made similar comments and I would recommend his latest book, The trillion dollar conspiracy, to all. He goes in some detail about eugenics and what the power elite is trying to do about it.
“If you were to take all of humanity and place them all in Texas, each person would have about an acre of land. And the rest of the world would be available.” from comment 38. Randy
Not quite Randy. With 268,820 square miles of area and 640 acres per square mile the actual acerage in Texas is 172,044,800.
The world’s population is estimated to be 6,900,000,000. It would take about 40 Texas’s to give each person an acre to live on. Please check your facts. Or you could jam in 26,000 people per square mile (27,878,400 square feet) each person would have about 1,000 sq feet. of course there would not be any room left for roads, parks or anything else. What an absurd comment.
I am surprised and appalled by the many completely non factual,unrealistic and overly religious comments here,you would think that in 2010-11 we would be much more educated.
There are many comments about the “elite” blah blah are you guys aware that most of the people you are talking about Don’t have kids? Are you aware that Warren Buffet still lives in the house he bought 40 years ago? He should be the poster child for frugality.
Are you aware that he has given a huge % (almost all)of the money he has “EARNED” to the betterment of mankind? Including Inner City Kids?
Where is the hypocrisy? I think it mainly lies with people who want to sit around arguing their opinion gained through personal prejudice not facts or reason and NOT producing anything for the world,before you talk about elitists compare what YOU as a individual have done for the world compared to that person you are criticizing?
Furthermore, to address the people that say Oh, there is no overpopulation!! well that can be dis-proven by cold hard facts and scientific data not talking out of your proverbial a**,…as Chris H just did above, Thank you Chris!
Also the population might currently be in decline but that is after reaching an all time high,a high that has severely affected the environment and the world.
SO people don’t need birth control they don’t need family planning,right?
So you tell me would you rather see kids whose parents are too poor to feed them use birth control or would you rather they continue to pop out kids they can’t feed,educate or house properly?
Do we need people that can’t afford to care for their kids or themselves for that matter to have MORE children!!!!!!???
Please wake up, they are born to suffer,they are born to go hungry and they are born to be trapped by their own reproduction.
Because let’s face it, with all the economic hardships their parents are struggling with,having to have one parent stay home to take care of the children will not improve their economic condition.
Birth Rates have dropped not due to some evil plan by the elites, but through common sense and rationality,raising one or two well cared for,highly educated children is better for the family and the World then raising 6 hungry,neglected kids that can’t read.
Just look at all the starving, suffering children in Africa, are you going to tell me that their parents need to “go forth and multiply?
The term is “be fruitful and multiply” if you can’t be Fruitful then you should not multiply either!!
That is people twisting the original scripture to justify reckless and irresponsible reproduction.
What do you think that poor over taxed African mother who can’t feed her existing children and has more on the way would have chosen if she had access to birth control?
She probably would have chosen to wait to have children until she could get a education,a career or at least enough resources to care for them properly, but instead with no access to birth control she is a victim of her own biology with no way to control the continuous births that endanger her own life,what with the poor to no medical care she has access to.
Extremes in regulation or Governmental intervention, I don’t support, but do I support giving people the means to control their own reproduction by Choice? Absolutely! Do I support every child coming into this world being planned, wanted and loved and the reduction of abortion through giving people the opportunity to plan their families?
Absolutely!
And we all Should, for the Betterment of Mankind and the World.
You’re nuts. We desperately need very strong population control. Humanity is killing the planet.
Jesus,God or any other divine power is not going to help. Things are not going to be okay. What will you do about it?
Bear in mind that it is NOT just Obama (and/or his “Science advisor” named above); people like George W. H. Bush Sr. and the evil (always around – like a bad apple) Henry Kissinger have been heavily involved in global eugenics and population control. The New York and London bankers that backed Bush Sr. (Harriman, Brown etc) were also of the mind that certain races were a threat (ie. brown people) to the Anglo-American superiority and rule. Also in their minds inferior. Basically they are racists. Bush Sr pushed contraception on third world countries in every bill he could while a US Congressman – so much so that he earned the nickname “Rubbers” from his fellow Congressmen. He also was a huge proponent of Planned Parenthood – especially their Foreign extension (when Bush finally became president – he had to drop his support due to political reasons – ie. the religious right). Kissenger was even more atrocious when he submitted a plan to Jimmy Carter that would create a manufactured or forced food shortage on all of Africa – therby causing a widespread famine – to get rid of the “useless eaters” (in his words). Carter rejected the plan.
BTW Kissinger mentored the young Bill Clinton just after college. Barrack Obama’s first job after college was in Kissinger’s firm. Our leaders are “groomed” many years in advance by the Global Elite.
The same World Bankers that are creating the current Global poverty – which stopped by my house on the way (we left the light on for ‘em)…
how ’bout you?
Time to wake up! The American dream is only for those who are asleep. Our Democracy only an illusion.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. The masses have the power to rise up. And I don’t know why all religious peoples (and atheists) can’t work together towards a common goal of ending tyranny and slavery globally.
The Corporatists can’t hold on to power forever… Or, can they?
Also I forgot to mention that during that time Planned Parenthood sponsered a “sterilization program” that effected millions of children as young as 12 years of age (!). The children (and I believe the parents) were unaware of what was happening. I forget exactly how this was carried out but, I do know that Bush Sr (and his ilk) were strongly supportive of Planned Parenthood’s agenda, and knew of this.
Regardless of political bias this should raise real questions about this organization.
You must realize that the Global Elite are evil doers and that they sit on top of let’s say a pyrimid shape. Picture a triangle shape, much like the “all seeing eye” on top of the pyrimid on the back of our dollar bill (pagenism on our money). Now imagine a line straight down the middle of the pyrimid (below) and the color of each half (or side) – one half BLUE (for the LEFT / Democrats) and the other side RED (for the RIGHT or Republicans). This is known as the FALSE Left – Right Paradigm. We must Un-Trap ourselves from it. For the Global Elite rule OVER both sides – these billinaires control the show and hand pick our leaders – THEY SIT AT THE TOP OVER BOTH SIDES.
In the final analysis – one party props the other party up – therefore making it hard to topple the triangle (above) or Global Elite. The difference between the two parties is very little. The purpose is to make it difficult for the people – you and I – to form a resistance. In a one party system a resistance could easily topple the pyrimid. In this two party system – the people are always divided twixt the two – making resistance that much more difficult. Therefore any evils put upon us by the Global Elite – who are actually in control – will continue.
Once you untrap yourself from the False Left – Right Paradigm, you can begin to realize who your real enemy is. And the evils are many and astounding. Population control by means of designer disease, endless wars, distruction of economies, Global poverty, etc. Untold atrocities. Including the ones in the article above.
The American dream (unfortunately) is for those who are asleep.
Time to wake up.
And I hate to say it but it’s true.
God help us all.
I see the moderator doesn’t like my posts. I wonder why? When one is so programmed that their mind is in a box within in the box, there is no wonder. Maybe it’s cognitive dissonence that’s he / she cannot tolerate. You know the old story of the Fox and the Grapes as in “Sour Grapes”
The Global Elite is nearly EVERYONE in Congress and certainly the White House and the people that own and run Wall Street and the Federal Reserve. This includes every politician who most certainly have voted for. Tell me there’s diference again, between of them? Other than maybe a Ron Paul or a Dennis Kucinich? A handfull tops.
Change the subject. Which canidate says that they will try and do something about inflation – which is hurting millions of Americans right NOW?! The Federal Reserve (which is privately owned by a cabal of International Banks) actively promotes Inflation by it’s policies – such as printing a Trillion dollars last year. Duh?!!!!!!!
The TRUTH will set you free.
Forget about it, delete this post to and back in you box you go.
I see the moderator doesn’t like my posts. I wonder why? When one is so programmed that their mind is in a box – within in the box, there is no wonder. Maybe it’s the cognitive dissonance that he/she cannot tolerate. You know the old story of the Fox and the Grapes as in “Sour Grapes”
The Global Elite is nearly EVERYONE in Congress and certainly the White House and the people that own and run Wall Street and the Federal Reserve. This includes every politician who most certainly have voted for. Tell me there’s difference again, between of them? Other than maybe a Ron Paul or a Dennis Kucinich? A handful tops.
Change the subject. Which candidate says that they will try and do something about inflation – which is hurting millions of Americans right NOW?! The Federal Reserve (which is privately owned by a cabal of International Banks) actively promotes Inflation by it’s policies – such as printing a Trillion dollars last year. Duh?!!!!!!!
The TRUTH will set you free.
Nah.. no it won’t, forget about it, delete this post too and back in your box you go.
PS: While we’re at it and since this is going nowhere anyway: a) there ain’t gonna be no “End Days” unless a whack job in the Pentagon or White House decides that an all out Nuclear war is the thing to go with [IE. Annihilation of humankind and most all other life on this God forsaken planet by man's own hand. Or of course they (the military) could decide to release into the world one of their designer man-made plagues! Can you back THAT science?!! I bet you could]
Jesus ain’t coming back. I mean think about it, would you? After what we’ve done to humankind and this world. The poverty we create and damage to mother earth with no regard. Besides do you think Jesus really wants to see the f***ing cross man?! Really? Better switch back to the original Christian symbol – the fish.
The end of civility is what’s coming. And Global poverty. Enslavement of the masses.
It may be wise to know that billionaires may not necessarily have or be loyal to any political distinction or could be either liberal or conservative… they are all still the elite. For instance, Rothschild of London may be a conservative, or may not – I don’t know. Or the Duponts for that matter. They do share ideas and they run the show, as in the so-called New World Order.
One may also wonder why their foot soldiers hang out when they are seemingly opposites. Ever wonder why in the last few years why Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush are such big golf buddies? Hmmmm…
The elite billionaires – like David Rockefelle are extremely intelligent and very diveous. Check this:
Who do you think started women’s lib? People thought that it a noble thing women getting into the workplace…?
That was the Rockefelle’s! They started women’s lib. Why? Because they realized that they could only tax half the population – the other half was sitting at home! The famous feminist Gloria Steinberg admitted – 30 years later – that the CIA funded the start up of her women’s magazine.
Why are they so concerned with population control? could it be that someday the masses may rise up against them?!
I guess my point is I wouldn’t put anything past any of them – these billonaires – no matter what their names are: Rockefelle, Rothschild, Dupont, Murdoch etc. whomever… all of them. Better lookout!
Here’s something most billionaire elitests won’t care about!:
How about ending childhood hunger in America by 2015
http://nokidhungry.org/
What would Jesus do about hungry kids?
[...] U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg…. [...]
To Julie Carol: people like YOU and those that promote Eugenics are the real cancer to this Earth, so please if you agree with what you say, do us a favor and start killing yourself before you breed more of the same monsters as you are, because clearly you’re a retard.